Elonna Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I just read that Terri Hatcher (Susan on "Desperate Housewives") hasn't had sex in FOUR YEARS. :shock: I felt great reading this. This is on the newstand right now, FHM (I think?) magazine...FMZ..something like that. Some mag for horny guys. Terri is on the cover in lingerie. I came here recently, wondering if perhaps I'm asexual, 'cos I haven't had sex in four years either! :D At least there is a celebrity admitting to no sex for that long. I believe Mariah Carey is another "no sex" in many years celebrity? Link to post Share on other sites
Cate Perfect Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Huh...what, since the birth of her daughter? She must be about four. Cate Link to post Share on other sites
ApolloSeek Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I just read that Terri Hatcher (Susan on "Desperate Housewives") hasn't had sex in FOUR YEARS. :shock: I felt great reading this. This is on the newstand right now, FHM (I think?) magazine...FMZ..something like that. Some mag for horny guys. Terri is on the cover in lingerie. I came here recently, wondering if perhaps I'm asexual, 'cos I haven't had sex in four years either! :D At least there is a celebrity admitting to no sex for that long. I believe Mariah Carey is another "no sex" in many years celebrity? How do you know that this isn't media hype? I don't regard FHM and the like as reliable sources of information. Link to post Share on other sites
Damien Day Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 How do you know that this isn't media hype? I don't regard FHM and the like as reliable sources of information. You should never believe anything the gossip mags reveal about celebrities.It's always a load of bollocks. The really sad thing about FHM magazine, by the way, is that when it first started it was a great men's mag with lots of interesting articles about various men doing all sorts of exciting jobs as well as other articles relevant to men's lives.Since then, unfortunately, it's turned almost into a clone of "Loaded" magazine, with tons of annoying ads, numerous interviews with bimbos who have nothing interesting to say whatsoever, and incredibly dull filler articles, such as questionnaires etc. I mean if you are going to do a real men's mag,then having everything centred round sex and women is contradictory - the readers then would be better off reading porn mags such as Razzle if they only want that kind of stuff. Strontium Dog Link to post Share on other sites
Live R Perfect Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Yeah, I'm hating on the 'men's mags' here too. Are there any men's mags out there that DON'T focus solely on skinny women in skimpy bikinis adopting pseudo-lesbian poses? Oh yeah, sorry, there is that one that concentrates on football AS WELL AS the nekkid women... :roll: We need to start a thinking man's magazine here. Link to post Share on other sites
Dargon Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Actually, the articles in Playboy are of rather high literary value. I know this from a friends 18th birthday, I was suprised at the quality of the articles in the magizine. Link to post Share on other sites
Live R Perfect Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Really?! It's a pity that we have to buy porn to read a decent article though, eh? Link to post Share on other sites
MInewbie Posted January 31, 2005 Share Posted January 31, 2005 i'm not a fan of Terri Hatcher but I just want to add that Maxim is probably one of the BEST magazines out there. Seriously. All my roommates and I (yes, all girls!) all through college read that mag. And for what it's worth, Playboy actually does have good articles (everyonce and awhile) :) afterall, that is why we buy the magazines. am I right, or am I right?! :) Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Actually, the articles in Playboy are of rather high literary value. I know this from a friends 18th birthday, I was suprised at the quality of the articles in the magizine. Actually, Playboy is known for its articles. Now, of course, the point of the whole rag is nudity; however, when the magazine was started, it was rather easy to be banned completely for being "pornography". If, though, your publication could be said to have "socially redeeming value", you were not considered rank "pornography" and you could publish. (Don't ask me where that definition came from. As I recall, it was some sort of judicial ruling, perhaps from the fracas that ensued when somebody decided to release the Danish film I Am Curious (Yellow) * in America. I could easily be mistaken, however. . . .) So, Hef went out of his way to make sure that the articles in Playboy were top notch. In fact, it pays more than any other publication for prose and, as a result, publishes only the very best of what it recieves. Therefore, it is, in fact, considered one of the top, if not the top, literary publication in terms of overall story quality. Believe it or not. That's where the "I only read it for the articles" statement comes from. *Now that's a "What tha --"movie, for you. . . Link to post Share on other sites
kbrd143 Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Actually, the articles in Playboy are of rather high literary value. I know this from a friends 18th birthday, I was suprised at the quality of the articles in the magizine. Actually, Playboy is known for its articles. Now, of course, the point of the whole rag is nudity; however, when the magazine was started, it was rather easy to be banned completely for being "pornography". If, though, your publication could be said to have "socially redeeming value", you were not considered rank "pornography" and you could publish. (Don't ask me where that definition came from. As I recall, it was some sort of judicial ruling, perhaps from the fracas that ensued when somebody decided to release the Danish film I Am Curious (Yellow) * in America. I could easily be mistaken, however. . . .) So, Hef went out of his way to make sure that the articles in Playboy were top notch. In fact, it pays more than any other publication for prose and, as a result, publishes only the very best of what it recieves. Therefore, it is, in fact, considered one of the top, if not the top, literary publication in terms of overall story quality. Believe it or not. That's where the "I only read it for the articles" statement comes from. *Now that's a "What tha --"movie, for you. . . [edit: thread tried to hide!] Link to post Share on other sites
spaceturtle Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 I occasionally browse www.playboy.com using lynx, a text-only webbrowser. That way I can read the articles without having to waste bandwidth on pictures :D. Link to post Share on other sites
kbrd143 Posted February 6, 2005 Share Posted February 6, 2005 I occasionally browse www.playboy.com using lynx, a text-only webbrowser. That way I can read the articles without having to waste bandwidth on pictures :D. Wow! What a wonderful idea, spaceturtle! I would honestly like to read playboy, but I am NOT going to sift through all of the airbrushed flesh to do so. . . . I will hafta see if I can get this browser to work on my system. . . (BTW, does you name refer to Gamera, by any chance?) Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.