Ace Amoeba Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 This was in Details magazine which is even more surprising, it being a men's magazine. That's right 9%. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
sound_the_bugle Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 April Fools? Or serious? 'Cause today I just can't tell. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
.// Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 How many were surveyed? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Ace Amoeba Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 chrilona, This was last month's magazine, so no joke. Nyu, I don't know, I'm having trouble finding more information. For a magazine names details, it doesn't provide anything but this. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
.// Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Hmmph... Sounds fishy. 9% seems like a large number. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Ace Amoeba Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 Yeah, it's certainly not the 1% estimate that has been replicated over and over again. Also, it's a sex survey and most all the other questions on the survey probably wouldn't apply to the average ace. The magazine isn't like Maxim or anything, but the number is suspect. Link to post Share on other sites
.// Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 My guess is they misidentified the people based on their answers? Link to post Share on other sites
sound_the_bugle Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I looked at this person's page and also discovered that they liked to pull things out of context (their thing about the thread of the married asexual woman for example - the quotes they pulled were offensive until I looked at the actual thread, which the page linked to, and discovered that many of the quotes they pulled weren't offensive in context.) Link to post Share on other sites
Guest member25959 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 One question comes to mind: What was their understanding of "asexuality"? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
sound_the_bugle Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 One question comes to mind: What was their understanding of "asexuality"? Clearly, 9% of the population can bud new offspring. :P 6 Link to post Share on other sites
Sennkestra Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 One question comes to mind: What was their understanding of "asexuality"? That's what I'm wondering as well. Some surveys have considered "asexuality" to be things like "not having sex in the last year" which obviously give rather distorted results. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Ace Amoeba Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 The original survey has been taken down off their site, and while I'd like to look at the questions, the survey was presented in a casual and easy to read way, not that anyone can blame Details for that. chrilona, yes I have been known to spin things and for that I offer no apologies, but in this case, unfortunately, there is nothing to spin. Link to post Share on other sites
sound_the_bugle Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 chrilona, yes I have been known to spin things and for that I offer no apologies, but in this case, unfortunately, there is nothing to spin. I apologize for that. I didn't realize that was your page, and I also meant no offense. I just saw other things out of context and saw this as possibly out of context. Again, many apologies. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
AndyJH Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 ahh maybe something is not accurate here, as say a married couple could not be having a sexual relationship for loads of different reasons but the magazine could be making asumptions that no sex in marrage eqiuils asexuallity Link to post Share on other sites
Oasis Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 We are the 9% 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Janus the Fox Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The survey would at least been limited to that particular magazine, so it would have been very small. Maybe 9% of Detail Magazine readers identify as Asexual, which sounds more accurate than saying 9% of everyone in the world is. But if someone could dig deeper into this could reveal interesting results ;) Plus an interest start from AVEN's past about Details Magazine needing people for an asexual survey dated 2004 may be related... Link to post Share on other sites
Thecatlady Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 My guess is a lot of these people have had a few too many bad breakups and are now identifying as asexual because of their idea that asexual people don't fall in love. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Scarlet Spider Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 lol Link to post Share on other sites
inqueertime Posted May 6, 2013 Share Posted May 6, 2013 I would be interested to look at the polling results and see what questions were actually asked, whether they were asking about what gender(s) attracted them or whether they actually asked about identity. In (A)sexual (the documentary that I'm assuming everyone here knows about), there was a study referenced where people were asked as to whether they were attracted to men, women, both men and women, more frequently men than women, more frequently women than men, or neither. The "neither" option could encapsulate transgender individuals that do not identify on the male-female gender binary. Sure, it could be a slim amount of people, but it's not good to marginalize minorities; it's a statistical error. It's one thing to conclude off of the mentioned poll that one percent of people are attracted to neither gender and another to say that one percent of people are asexual. I'm just stating all of the above just in case the poll was not trans*-friendly. *special sparkles* Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts