Jump to content

Trump`s pressure


Alex Po

Recommended Posts

US President D. Trump plans to introduce a naval blockade of Venezuela to prevent the delivery of goods to the republic. Washington did the same with Cuba in 1962. Experts believe that all this aggressive activity on the part of the United States aggravates the situation between the two states and, according to President of Venezuela N. Maduro, is actually a «blockade of the country».

 

The world community is concerned about this situation, and especially the presence of a kind of diarchy Maduro and Guaido. Relations between the two states affect not only America and Venezuela, but also stability and security in the world. After all, it is known that Washington in every way helps the opposition of the republic and insists on the need for new presidential elections in the country. At the same time, representatives of the Trump administration do not rule out a possible military invasion of Venezuela.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a good idea, especially as Venezuela is pally with Russia (The enemy of our enemy is our friend), all that will come out of that is bad, and an energy crisis in Europe when an irate Putin turns off the gas supply 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So much for that small government and fiscal responsibility republicans like Trump claim to support. Wasting money and using big government to be the world’s police.

Link to post
Share on other sites
FindingTheta
On 8/20/2019 at 8:31 AM, Gloomy said:

So much for that small government and fiscal responsibility republicans like Trump claim to support. Wasting money and using big government to be the world’s police.

 

And our domestic surveillance state and corporate enforcers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no way to predict what Trump will or will not do.  While he's causing distraction by getting everyone in a lather about his possible global actions, his actual actions are causing mayhem for poor people and the environment in the US.  He himself could not tell you what he will do tomorrow, except to screw everyone who disagrees with him.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

"We can't let them go on like this. They're filthy commies!"

 

So sick of the US meddling in other countries. The US government has been doing this since the 1950s. They say it's because they care about the people in those countries, but really the only thing they care about is power. Trump is no exception.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee, what could they have to make us act this way...……………………………………………...….........………………………………...………...…………………………………......…..OIL???

Link to post
Share on other sites
FindingTheta

America has been trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government since the early 2000s, and because of sanctions and other economic warfare tactics is responsible for the conditions in that country. Guaido represents the rich and corporate (and American neoliberal) interests, while Maduro, as unpopular as he is, has support of the people on the lower end of the socioeconomic ladder largely because of Chavez's vision that resonates with them.

 

America wants every country in its backyard to be included in the American hegemony, and Canada along with the EU gives their blessing to this endeavor. America wants Venezuela to be completely open to corporate control, especially it's resources. America wants Venezuela to be more like Honduras with an authoritarian government that oppresses the people and privatized their health and education systems, making them inaccessible to the people who need them while stratifying wealth to where only a few that are loyal to America have it.

 

As much and I dislike Maduro, Guaido is illegitimate, and this is a textbook coup. Venezuela would be worse off by far with Guaido in charge than Maduro because his interests aren't aligned with the well-being of his people. This is an act of neoimperialism, and the EU as well as Canada are complicit. It isn't that the world community (namely the aforementioned two) are worried about stability and security, they're more worried that Maduro is still in power, and this coup wasn't as easy as expected. Way too often. "Stability and Security" has been the excuse for forced compliance of developing nations into the U.S. and EU, neoliberal vision of the world, and this is another example of that policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump is just spitting the dummy out of his mouth.

 

Americas reputation in this world, is pretty much ruined as a decent leader in our world, and america cannot stand it.

 

The venezuelan people did not want to know, and americans cannot stand it, that a countries people, did not want to accept americas useless promises. America knows it cannot do anything in venezuela, without the people there, and the people there do not want to know.

 

Every country on earth has a minority of people whom hate the current ptb, or gov. America exploits these in any country they target, but conveniently ignores the minority in america whom hate there own gov.

 

Leaving russia and china aside, for one minute, america cannot do anything in venezuela, as the people of venezuela said they do not want to know about american promises.

 

America has made sure all countries south of there border, are in the dirt, so why would anyone listen to american promises down there, when america time and time again, failed to bring the garden of eden they promised. Instead every time america brought hell on earth to countries, that fell for there promises to the south of usa border.

 

That guaido they offered venezuela, was the typical leader of a nothing violent group of people, that no one should want to allign with. Good for those in venezuela for not wanting such a person.

 

The people of venezuela, voted in maduro, and he is there elected official. He then has a right to ask what ever country he wants for help, and this is his right.

 

Venezuelan people have a right to pick who they want as leader, and america has no right to force a leader of a nothing group, with hardly any support to be there leader. Guaido had no support, and venezuelans had a right to say no to him. They picked maduro, and thats there absolute right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Half of Central America and most of the Middle East have cause to regret meddling by the USA. Indirectly so does Europe and the USA itself. Would things like the Twin Towers have happened if the USA had been less antagonistic towards the Islamic world? 

If, along with dragging their puppet state (Britain) into an illegal war in Iraq, would an enormous power vacuum have been created which resulted in the rise of ISIL? Would Putin have been able to play his power games in Syria, which ultimately caused Britain to vote for Brexit, weakening the European Union which he perceives as his greatest threat? 

Trump is merely following in a long line of USA leaders who rule by war-war not jaw-jaw 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, SkyenAutowegCaptain said:

Half of Central America and most of the Middle East have cause to regret meddling by the USA. Indirectly so does Europe and the USA itself. Would things like the Twin Towers have happened if the USA had been less antagonistic towards the Islamic world? 

If, along with dragging their puppet state (Britain) into an illegal war in Iraq, would an enormous power vacuum have been created which resulted in the rise of ISIL? Would Putin have been able to play his power games in Syria, which ultimately caused Britain to vote for Brexit, weakening the European Union which he perceives as his greatest threat? 

Trump is merely following in a long line of USA leaders who rule by war-war not jaw-jaw 

It's worth noticing that pretty much every president who came after Eisenhower has dragged the US into at least one pointless war. I think the executive branch is controlled to a large degree by the weapons industry who require a steady stream of wars to remain profitable. War has very little to do with self defense and everything to do with making sure the corporate elites keep getting their big, fat paychecks, even if it means killing a few thousand innocent people in the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Some guy said:

It's worth noticing that pretty much every president who came after Eisenhower has dragged the US into at least one pointless war. I think the executive branch is controlled to a large degree by the weapons industry who require a steady stream of wars to remain profitable. War has very little to do with self defense and everything to do with making sure the corporate elites keep getting their big, fat paychecks, even if it means killing a few thousand innocent people in the process.

It is very difficult to refute this post 🎂 

Link to post
Share on other sites
FindingTheta
1 hour ago, SkyenAutowegCaptain said:

It is very difficult to refute this post 🎂 

And it's verifiable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...