Dawg4280 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 https://athensuncharted.com/2016/09/27/invisible-orientation/ Link to post Share on other sites
JAKQ7111 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 I like this piece a lot! It is very well-written and eloquently put. Thank you for sharing it! Link to post Share on other sites
cavalier080854 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Since gender became a social construct and identity politics, I feel the asexual community has become even less visible, with more vocal genders ie trans, genderqueer, shouting and getting more attention. At least in biology 101 the genders/sex were hetero/homo/bi and asexual. We were the 4th sex AKA the invisible ones. Now we are buried under 1000's of genders, and it's become a mockery of an idea caused by crazies running away with a theory and ruining it and muddying the gender waters. Asexuals are not new, I found in the British Library a first edition dictionary from 1830 with both of the present day definitions. So we are even older than that, an anachronism sufficient to rate a mention in the first dictionaries. Link to post Share on other sites
Muledeer Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Nice job, Tim. Good article. Link to post Share on other sites
Dawg4280 Posted September 28, 2016 Author Share Posted September 28, 2016 Since gender became a social construct and identity politics, I feel the asexual community has become even less visible, with more vocal genders ie trans, genderqueer, shouting and getting more attention. At least in biology 101 the genders/sex were hetero/homo/bi and asexual. We were the 4th sex AKA the invisible ones. Now we are buried under 1000's of genders, and it's become a mockery of an idea caused by crazies running away with a theory and ruining it and muddying the gender waters. Asexuals are not new, I found in the British Library a first edition dictionary from 1830 with both of the present day definitions. So we are even older than that, an anachronism sufficient to rate a mention in the first dictionaries. I kind of get what you mean. I do believe that gender is a social construct and fully support people who don't fit on the binary. However, the amount of labels floating around serves against deconstructing gender as a social construct; IMO. I know that labels can help you find people you identify with, but beyond that they can really work against the main cause. It's like some are saying gender is a social construct that works against trans and non binary people, but here is how I am going to adhere to it anyway. Why not just say that it is a social construct, use specific labels within your the trans community, and then say to hell with the social construct. I am gender nonconforming, but I am also cis male. But I don't try to say that my gender is something so specific, while also saying it is a social construct in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.