The Flatworm Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 http://imgur.com/hPuGKes The basic premise of the scale is that there are two components to a human's attraction: Who they are attracted to, and how they are attracted to them. It is based on a 7-point number scale (Identical to Kinsey's) and a 6-point letter scale (ranging from aromantic asexual to hypersexual.) The name "Purple-Red" comes from "Purple" (asexual) and "Red-Blooded". In addition to replacing Tumblristic word salad, the scale should be great for dating sites. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 It's a good idea I think, but some things are missing. What if you're pansexual/romantic, and don't really care about a person's sex or gender? Link to post Share on other sites
chromanebula Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 That would go with bi. Maybe change bi to bi/pan, with the tagline Equal/Gender-Neutral Attraction? Link to post Share on other sites
chromanebula Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 And you might want to get rid of the "Tertiary Sexuality" part, because it can also apply to romantic asexuals and demisexuals. Maybe replace 2 and 3 with "Sex-Repulsed" and "Sex-Indifferent"? That might be a clearer distinction. Link to post Share on other sites
Agent Rainbow Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 It's cool. I like it. Link to post Share on other sites
chromanebula Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 More differentiation between sexuals would also be an improvement (low, medium, high primary attraction). I'm not knocking your scale; I think it's a very good idea. I just think some of the distinctions could be a bit better. Link to post Share on other sites
Archon Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 You might consider having a separate scale of "human desire" or something like that, since some people like cupiosexuals and lithsexuals experience attraction and desire differently. And how would someone who is non-binary themselves use the orientations scale? What if I'm a non-binary person who is attracted to women? Link to post Share on other sites
allrightalready Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 D6 works for me, being binary and having binary attraction does make life simpler for me though Link to post Share on other sites
Batman's Ace Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 I like the choice of purple and red, and the reasons! It certainly covers more of the options than the normal 0-6 (X) scale, although like any diagram it doesn't include every single nuance. Link to post Share on other sites
Archon Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 I just noticed that you say this would be ideal for dating sites. This might not entirely suitable for that on its own. For example, some people who are aromantic do like dating... which goes back to why you might need the "human desire" scale I mentioned, since that aromantic person would have the desire for romance even if they don't feel attraction. Also not sure if this allows for non-ace aros, or for people who are romantically attracted to one gender and sexually attracted to another. Link to post Share on other sites
Desmister Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 I definitely think it's an interesting concept but I feel like there are some things missing. It covers more than the regular scale does, which is a plus Link to post Share on other sites
Frigid Pink Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 And you might want to get rid of the "Tertiary Sexuality" part, because it can also apply to romantic asexuals and demisexuals. Maybe replace 2 and 3 with "Sex-Repulsed" and "Sex-Indifferent"? That might be a clearer distinction. Yeah, "tertiary sexuality" seems to suggest that "asexuality" is about behavior (instead of attraction) and that asexual people who have sex aren't really asexual people, which definitely isn't the case and certainly not how I view "asexuality." Link to post Share on other sites
EdenRose Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 I'd miss sapioromantic, but otherwise I'd go for B2. :) Link to post Share on other sites
ladydandyyvette Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 I like it better than Kinsey but like many others have said there are still things missing. What about 'Grey A'? Would that be under C? Link to post Share on other sites
Kuromi Akumura Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 I'm confused where i am on it because i could be a C or B but not really attracted to any gender since i only have had one exception that makes me not A Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cairne Bloodhoof Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 Good work :) . According to your scale, I am B1, as I want to have romantic relationship. I am attracted to the opposite sex, but I think I may have relationship with sex:female/gender: genderqueer type of person too. Link to post Share on other sites
A Member Once Known As tqz Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 If that fits your perspective of people, then fine… I don't really see anything on the chart for me, or anybody else (i.e. a real person)… Thank you for sharing your own perspective of people. I won't assume I understand it. Link to post Share on other sites
Xavy Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 for the most part people seem to like it and find it quite useful (I have shared it with a few friends), however, I am neither here nor there about it. Link to post Share on other sites
Hallowitch Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 Bloody brilliant! I hate the frigging kinsey scale. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.