m4rble Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 On 9/8/2017 at 8:31 AM, JDP said: Let them wear dark shades. They work for eclipses, too. lol Link to post Share on other sites
JessiBird Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 21 hours ago, m4rble said: The idea is that the prude police would have less of an excuse to tell people not to be naked. Would we even have dress codes? Like I get it for professional environments, but in schools there would be no reason to control whether someone wears a tank top or not. That's mostly the drive behind school dress codes, so maybe there would be more freedom in clothes overall. Fashion would be completely different, whether or not we would wear clothes. I mean, it's so cold where I live that you'd kinda need to. Link to post Share on other sites
m4rble Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 27 minutes ago, JessiBird said: . That's mostly the drive behind school dress codes, so maybe there would be more freedom in clothes overall. It's a pretty stupid drive behind school dress codes as it is if you ask me, lol. Are people seriously worried that people will get too horned up to concentrate on their classes if they see a bit of bare shoulder?! Link to post Share on other sites
IntellectualAsexual Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 No more issues with lots of stuff. No porn, no STD's, no rape, no prostitution, no public displays of affection, no jealousy (at least not over a partner), no guys killing over a pretty girl, people are no longer discriminated against due to how much sex appeal they possess. No more affairs, divorces, immoral relationships. No promiscuity, no lesbianism, no virgins after the guy/girl, no killing your spouse's new GF. No sexual slang or insults...it means nothing anyway. No political scandals over sex stuff. No more servant girl/slave girl master relationships. No more fights over girls/guys. No more LGBTQ rights conflicts, or marriage issues like is it legal/ok to marry more than one female? No, there are laws against that now. And I think to myself what a wonderful world. Link to post Share on other sites
Homer Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 35 minutes ago, IntellectualAsexual said: No more issues with lots of stuff. No porn, no STD's, no rape, no prostitution, no public displays of affection, no jealousy (at least not over a partner), no guys killing over a pretty girl, people are no longer discriminated against due to how much sex appeal they possess. No more affairs, divorces, immoral relationships. No promiscuity, no lesbianism, no virgins after the guy/girl, no killing your spouse's new GF. No sexual slang or insults...it means nothing anyway. No political scandals over sex stuff. No more servant girl/slave girl master relationships. No more fights over girls/guys. No more LGBTQ rights conflicts, or marriage issues like is it legal/ok to marry more than one female? No, there are laws against that now. And I think to myself what a wonderful world. Now a lot of that is factually inaccurate. People being asexual won't magically make STDs go away, nor does it eliminate the risk of it when they do have sex regardless. PDAs aren't necessarily connected to sex. Jealousy, killing people over pretty people... nothing sex-exclusive either. Affairs, divorces, immoral relationships, lesbianism, fights over people, LGBTQ rights, marriage, slave/master... all these things can happen in an ace world just as well. I wonder where you got your ideas from. smh Link to post Share on other sites
IntellectualAsexual Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 Why would they exist in an asexual world? There would then be no place for them. They wouldn't have sex at all if everyone were asexuals, because nobody would make them. Why would they kill over possessing an attractive person if they didn't desire to possess them? Affairs would not happen because people wouldn't have a relationship in the first place. Why be a lesbian if you asexual? You don't need a sexual identity then. There wouldn't be divorce because there would be no marriage. Unless its for nonsexual purposes, like material possessions and stuff like that. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.