Puck Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Please be careful making judgments of other's sexualities and romantic orientation. Discussing them is fine, invalidating them is not. Moving forward, please refrain from any talk that might invalidate objectum sexual or objectum romantic orientations. Puck Moderator, The Gray Area and The Sex Talk Link to post Share on other sites
Skycaptain Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Going back to the original article. The point which most people seem to have overlooked is their menage à trois. Partners, so perhaps experiencing attraction to each other, also feel attraction to an (in this case animate) object. When it comes to objectum (a) sexuality, I can entirely empathise with these people. Humorous aside, maybe ecosexuals experience orgasms during earthquakes (did the earth move for you and all that) Link to post Share on other sites
Homer Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Must. Refrain. From. Making. Tasteless. Joke... I think that this isn't comparable to actual objectumsexuality AT ALL. This a try to attract attention; a weird way to say "Hey look, nature is pretty cool." Link to post Share on other sites
Grumpy Alien Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 6 hours ago, Homer said: Must. Refrain. From. Making. Tasteless. Joke... I think that this isn't comparable to actual objectumsexuality AT ALL. This a try to attract attention; a weird way to say "Hey look, nature is pretty cool." Yeah. They're not actually sexually attracted to nature. It's basically a marketing ploy. Link to post Share on other sites
MaxAmoeba Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 In an over- sexualised world, this was the only thing missing! Isn't this sex deprived world done with procreating enough for the world to explode! She is a porn star-turned-controversial performance artist. Obviously she cannot get over sex it seems. Ecological issues are a growing concern and I don't think treating it this way is helping the cause anyhow. More than reducing the seriousness of the issue, some pervert movement like this doesn't do any good. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 On 20/05/2017 at 5:03 AM, King of the Forest said: Oh please, these are just people looking for attention as "oh hey look we are inventing a new sexuality cuz..why not, Im bored, an science can back it up because plants have sex organs.." This reads more like an Ad than it does news.. and I suggest that woman get breast reduction surgery before she breaks her back humping a tree root..next My boobs are way bigger than hers, I feel offended that you're technically suggesting I'd break my back if I try to hump tree roots. That's oppression of my boobs and my possible future sexual preferences!! Now I need a safe space :'c *has a meltdown in the corner* Link to post Share on other sites
God of the Forest Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, Pan. said: My boobs are way bigger than hers, I feel offended that you're technically suggesting I'd break my back if I try to hump tree roots. That's oppression of my boobs and my possible future sexual preferences!! Now I need a safe space :'c *has a meltdown in the corner* yes, I've seen your boobs lol, Sorry didnt mean to invalidate your boob identity, I was just poking fun at her ecosexualness and used her boobs to suggest she doesnt need to be molesting an oak tree Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, King of the Forest said: yes, I've seen your boobs lol, Sorry didnt mean to invalidate your boob identity, I was just poking fun at her ecosexualness and used her boobs to suggest she doesnt need to be molesting an oak tree Haha I know what you meant, I just like joking about boobs so couldn't help myself Link to post Share on other sites
God of the Forest Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Pan. said: Haha I know what you meant, I just like joking about boobs so couldn't help myself I was going to suggest you enter into Guiness World Book for largest boobies but apparently that title is already held by an american woman and each breast weights like 45 kilos each!! thats almost like having two of me strapped to her chest! Link to post Share on other sites
Homer Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Pan. said: so couldn't help myself You couldn't help yourself so you helped yourself to a joke Also: 10 minutes ago, King of the Forest said: yes, I've seen your boobs lol AVEN gem right here. re: objectumsexuality There's a pretty insightful thread on the subject right here. Totally different ball game. Link to post Share on other sites
flowerage Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 On 5/18/2017 at 1:09 PM, Anthracite_Impreza said: Umm, no, if there's an emotional connection and not just 'getting off' (as it is with the fence and theme park ride ladies), it's objectum sexuality which is an orientation. Of course the media is going to focus on the sexual part because 'Hey, hey! Look at these freaks! Click on our link!'. Thank you for letting us know we're disgusting, because even though I'm not sexual I'm certainly objectum. @Anthracite_Impreza Please, the sarcasm was unnecessary; I never said that you, or anyone else, for that matter, was disgusting. I'm no expert, but through a basic dissection of the classifications/degrees of sexuality, this specific form of "ecosexuality" (please note my distinction, as I was referring to the original article of ecosexuality) does not appear to be its own sexual orientation when the majority of people are otherwise hetero- or homo-sexual. Link to post Share on other sites
Anthracite_Impreza Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 4 minutes ago, flowerage said: @Anthracite_Impreza Please, the sarcasm was unnecessary; I never said that you, or anyone else, for that matter, was disgusting. I'm no expert, but through a basic dissection of the classifications/degrees of sexuality, this specific form of "ecosexuality" (please note my distinction, as I was referring to the original article of ecosexuality) does not appear to be its own sexual orientation when the majority of people are otherwise hetero- or homo-sexual. If you'd seen the comments I've seen about my orientation you'd be bitter too. Link to post Share on other sites
flowerage Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 On 5/23/2017 at 6:54 PM, Anthracite_Impreza said: If you'd seen the comments I've seen about my orientation you'd be bitter too. I'm sorry about that. I've noticed it's hard enough being slightly aro, and being asked to write essays about romance and desire in the literature class I'm taking. Besides, isn't capitalism a much more interesting topic?? Link to post Share on other sites
Anthracite_Impreza Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 10 minutes ago, flowerage said: I'm sorry about that. It's hard enough being aro, and being asked to write essays about romance and desire in the literature class I'm taking. Isn't capitalism a much more interesting topic?? I can't even talk about capitalism without getting riled up.., Link to post Share on other sites
flowerage Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 @Anthracite_Impreza Okay, cookies, then. Link to post Share on other sites
Anthracite_Impreza Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 @flowerage; Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.