creepqveen Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 Lets assume for one reason or another that you weren't aware that your partner was asexual when you married (perhaps they hadn't yet discovered that about themselves), if you could have known beforehand that they were asexual, would you have still married them? Link to post Share on other sites
Tarfeather Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 I'm not married, but I still would marry my partner regardless, yes. Link to post Share on other sites
Autumn Season Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 I'm not in this situation, but I read several posts in which the sexual partner said that they would not have married. Link to post Share on other sites
cupid69 Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 I wouldn't consider it to be a full union, so possibly would have to have had a serious chat beforehand, provided the partner knew what they were like. Link to post Share on other sites
Telecaster68 Posted November 25, 2015 Share Posted November 25, 2015 Honestly, I don't know. If I'd known what would happen, the attraction would still have been there, but the thought of sex withering on the vine before I was forty, never being desired, and the whole thing becoming a source of tension rather than joy would give me huge cause for concern. If there had been just no sex from the beginning, then definitely not. It wouldn't be a 'relationship' relationship, just friends. Great, close, friends, but we could have the pleasures of friendship without the strain that the absence of sex in a marriage brings for a sexual person. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.