Siggy Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Veearrell, it's really not clear what you're asking, and your claims of not wanting to start a fight strike me as disingenuous. Link to post Share on other sites
ThaHoward Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Veearrell, it's really not clear what you're asking, and your claims of not wanting to start a fight strike me as disingenuous. Maybe if you say what you agreed on and why it is reasonable she will come closer to know what you deem reasonable? Link to post Share on other sites
veearrell Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Veearrell, it's really not clear what you're asking, and your claims of not wanting to start a fight strike me as disingenuous. Considering the excessively-confrontational tone of some people in this thread, what you define as "reasonable" might not actually be from an objective standpoint. So I'm asking how you define "reasonable". I think it's a valid question. Link to post Share on other sites
Siggy Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 @Veearrell, Maybe if you rephrase the question rather than just repeating it in the same words over and over. Link to post Share on other sites
veearrell Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 @Veearrell, Maybe if you rephrase the question rather than just repeating it in the same words over and over. What, in your opinion, would be a reasonable outcome? One that's fair to everyone or one that favors you at the expense of others? Link to post Share on other sites
Siggy Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 @veearrell, Clearly I think what I want is fair, and you think what you want is fair. As for whether you think what I want is fair, I have already expressed my views, and you have not expressed yours, so I think you're in a better position to judge. Link to post Share on other sites
CosineTheCat Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Let me step in, Veearell, during the meeting we went over major concerns about the archive and why it is there. Also concerns about using full links. We addressed all of these and some others, we explored what is best for AVEN and the bloggers and came to a couple ideas that could benefit both. As of right now, the admods are working on some stuff in the admods and I am not able to share how it will work, but what we are working on used the input and concerns of the bloggers that attended the meeting. Link to post Share on other sites
Vestal Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 I've been removing my posts. Here's an example: http://www.asexuality.org/en/topic/121337-deleted/Nedless to say, I'm not going to post more articles on the World Watch subforum. Link to post Share on other sites
veearrell Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 I've been removing my posts. Here's an example: http://www.asexuality.org/en/topic/121337-deleted/ Nedless to say, I'm not going to post more articles on the World Watch subforum. I'd like to register my fury that you were bullied into doing that and before this post gets deleted by the admods and I get at least one warning point, if not a ban, I'd like to say fuck copyrights and fuck the people who own them. This whole thing should never have come to this. This is wrong. Morally, this is wrong. Sharing knowledge and culture with the world is the ENTIRE FUCKING REASON the internet was invented in the first place and if we as a society just accept not being allowed to do so, then what the fuck is the internet even good for? Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 As this thread is no longer constructive, I am locking it. +Pookzar, Administrator Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.