Jump to content

something of a silly question


Recommended Posts

I've been peeking around the forum for the last two days, and I noticed that people here call those who aren't asexual "sexuals." This makes complete and obvious sense; there's nothing wrong with that. But are there any acceptable alternatives to use? I feel a bit awkward at the thought of referring to people that way despite how streamlined it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some prefer to say allosexual. Other than that you could probally say non-asexual.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Akira Jumps

Allosexuals, sexuals, non-asexuals all work fine, but if you'd like to be a bit more detailed you can always call them heterosexual, pan-, homo-,bi-, etc. All forms are accepted, most just use the term sexuals because it encompasses all the different forms of sexual people. Allo- and non- work the same way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I absolutely understand why it's the term most people use. I guess I'm just not as familiar with all the labels out there. I feel irrationally embarrassed using the word sexual as a noun.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, actually the word 'asexual' makes me irrationally embarassed! :redface: As did 'bisexual' when I identified that way. Luckily bisexual abbreviates to 'bi'... guess I should switch over to 'ace' or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My non-asexual bf has transitioned to saying "ace" faster than me, haha. I like it, but I think it requires more confidence to use than I have just yet.

I recently saw "zedsexual" proposed, to imply the opposite end of the spectrum as "asexual". But for an American not used to saying "zed", it sounds way too goofy to me ;) I definitely prefer allo- or non-. I've found it useful to have something besides "sexual" in online conversations, so one can distinguish between a sexual person, and a sexual thing/act etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CherryAllen

"The Others" lol. I only ever use the term when I'm with my friends that are all sexuals (and now, apparently) and I say something along the lines of "yo, hold your sexualism in for a moment, yeah? There's an asexual in the room." If anything I'd add a prefix to them (hetero, bi, etc)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ugh, I can understand a lack of confidence all too well. I haven't had the guts to talk to more than one person about my asexuality face-to-face, and even then, I didn't use any labels. Prefixes definitely sound like the way to go (the only way to go? haha), and allosexual or non-asexual might be the easiest way for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lady MacBethany

While allosexual is a perfectly acceptable term, it's worth noting that in Canada and some other places where French is commonly spoken, allosexual just means non-heterosexual. So keep that in mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...