ithaca Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 http://www.irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/healthandlife/relationships/id-like-a-relationship-but-i-dont-like-sex-319414.html I’d like a relationship but I don’t like sex Saturday, March 21, 2015 By Suzi Godson I’m a 24-year-old girl and have never been sexually attracted to anyone. However, I would like to experience a romance. I’ve had a couple of relationships that involved sex and they didn’t work because being sexually intimate turned me off. Friends have suggested it could be because I’m gay but I’ve never been attracted to a woman either. How can I find a romantic partner who will accept me for who I am? You don’t identify yourself as “asexual” but your description fits the definition of a person who does not experience sexual attraction. Asexuality is a difficult concept for people to understand as it challenges the universally-held assumption that sex is a biological necessity. In its most rigid interpretation, asexuality is “non-libidoist”, which means the person never experiences sexual desires. You would be more correctly defined as a heteroromantic asexual; someone who seeks romantic relationships with the opposite sex for companionship, affection and emotional intimacy, but does not experience sexual attraction. Asexuals can also be homoromantic (romantically but not sexually attracted to people of the same sex) or biromantic (romantically attracted to people of either sex). This tendency for asexuals to try to microdefine their nuances is problematic. It creates a confusing lexicon of sexual labels. However asexuals define themselves, their lack of interest in an aspect of intimacy that is fundamental for the majority is always going to limit their romantic options. Experts also identify another category, demisexual (someone who only experiences sexual attraction to a person after forming a strong emotional bond with them). Such people generally realise that they have this potential before they meet someone new, but I’m not sure that you fall into this category. Since you have already experienced several relationships where attraction has failed to develop, the chance is slim that you will find a partner who magically unlocks an aspect of yourself that has not yet materialised. Most asexuals realise that their sexual orientation is not straightforward, but until recently it was difficult for them to work out why. The American activist David Jay realised that he was asexual at the age of 15 and set up the Asexual Visibility and Education Network (Aven), which is a fantastic resource and has more than 1,200 members. No one is sure how many people are asexual, but in 2004 Professor Anthony Bogaert at Brock University in Canada worked out that 1% of people in a sample of 18,000 UK residents clicked on an option that indicated that they had “never felt sexual attraction to anyone at all”. Despite this, a third of the people who defined themselves as asexual were in a long-term relationship and another 11% had experienced at least one long-term relationship, although they reported low levels of sexual activity. Last year Aven built on this research by conducting a survey of 10,880 asexuals. The relative youth of the respondents is notable; the median average age is just 21. Most participants had never engaged in sexual activity, 12.4% were sexually active and nearly a quarter had been sexually active. The most commonly-cited reason for having sex was “to please a partner”, but sexual generosity can only go so far. It is hard enough for couples to negotiate sexual relationships, but when one partner wants sex and the other is indifferent or repulsed by the idea, it is almost impossible to make things work. * Send your questions to suzigodson@mac.com Link to post Share on other sites
Vega91 Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Good that the author knew about asexuality, but once again aromanticism was completely erased. (As was panromanticism) Also, maybe it's just me but this article seemed to have a bit of a negative tone. This tendency for asexuals to try to microdefine their nuances is problematic. It creates a confusing lexicon of sexual labels. However asexuals define themselves, their lack of interest in an aspect of intimacy that is fundamental for the majority is always going to limit their romantic options. It is hard enough for couples to negotiate sexual relationships, but when one partner wants sex and the other is indifferent or repulsed by the idea, it is almost impossible to make things work. Of course, logically we all know that it is a challenge to make ace/sexual relationships work, but it's certainly not impossible, especially if a partner is only indifferent. And stating that defining romantic orientation is problematic really seems counterintuitive. Link to post Share on other sites
ithaca Posted April 3, 2015 Author Share Posted April 3, 2015 Sometimes I wonder if they use the same pictures over and over for articles on asexuality :P And just like, how's life for those models who spend their working day being photographed on a bed looking unsatisfied, or with only their feet being photographed out of the blanket ('cause obviously, we all lay in bed like that, don't we?). Link to post Share on other sites
Unestel Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 Sometimes I wonder if they use the same pictures over and over for articles on asexuality :P And just like, how's life for those models who spend their working day being photographed on a bed looking unsatisfied, or with only their feet being photographed out of the blanket ('cause obviously, we all lay in bed like that, don't we?). Haha, yes, "that one" again. I noticed it's not only used for asexual articles but articles about (often medical) problems with someone's sex life as well. Really, the lack of imagination (or just laziness) shown.... Link to post Share on other sites
Vega91 Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 Especially since there's so many options online. Wait why are they all wearing white? Seriously I think they're all wearing the same clothes. Link to post Share on other sites
the bumbling rotifer Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 Sometimes I wonder if they use the same pictures over and over for articles on asexuality :P And just like, how's life for those models who spend their working day being photographed on a bed looking unsatisfied, or with only their feet being photographed out of the blanket ('cause obviously, we all lay in bed like that, don't we?). Haha, yes, "that one" again. I noticed it's not only used for asexual articles but articles about (often medical) problems with someone's sex life as well. Really, the lack of imagination (or just laziness) shown.... I really want to start a thread on "caption the cliched asexuality photograph" now... "Oh no, she's using her telepathic powers again!" Link to post Share on other sites
ithaca Posted April 3, 2015 Author Share Posted April 3, 2015 I really want to start a thread on "caption the cliched asexuality photograph" now... It'd be nice if there weren't only, like, 4 or 5 pictures used in all articles on asexuality. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.